ArticleInternational orthopaedics2026
Navicular bone morphometry for implant planning in fracture surgery: a dry bone analysis.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe purpose of this study is to quantitatively characterise surgically relevant morphometric features of dry navicular bones and to provide anatomical reference values that can be utilised in implant placement.
methodsFifty-five isolated, unpaired dry navicular bones without macroscopic deformity were examined. Tuberosity morphology, tuberosity-medial cuneiform distances, navicular body dimensions (mediolateral width, level-specific anteroposterior measurements, and depth), talonavicular articular surface depth, and concavity index were evaluated using a digital caliper and digital thickness gauge.
resultsThe narrowest tuberosity width, anteroposterior length, and supero-inferior height were 6.59 ± 1.28 mm, 16.38 ± 2.43 mm, and 11.24 ± 1.26 mm, respectively. The tuberosity groove depth was 2.05 ± 0.92 mm. The distances from the tuberosity midpoint to the medial cuneiform articular surface at the nearest and farthest points were 21.86 ± 3.11 mm, 29.65 ± 3.37 mm. The mean mediolateral body width was 37.69 ± 3.54 mm. Level-specific anteroposterior dimensions were 18.01 ± 2.34 mm, 15.15 ± 2.15 mm, and 12.56 ± 1.62 mm, whereas the corresponding body depths were 18.35 ± 3.01 mm, 25.24 ± 2.30 mm, and 22.52 ± 2.47 mm, respectively.
conclusionThese findings provide surgically relevant anatomical reference values that may assist preoperative planning and support safer fixation of navicular fractures, and contribute to the design and optimisation of navicular implants and fixation devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.