ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026
Moral dilemma of family caregivers of urostomy patients: a qualitative study.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe most prevalent malignant tumor of the urinary system, bladder cancer, exhibits a rising global incidence rate. However, recent diagnostic and therapeutic techniques, such as ostomy surgery, can effectively prolong patient survival. The majority of patients require support from family carers, presenting considerable challenges to these caregivers. Although existing research has primarily focused on patients' physiological adaptation, quality of life, and the burden on family carers, the moral dilemmas faced by these caregivers have not been explored yet. PURPOSE: This study aimed to explore the psychological and moral dilemmas of family caregivers in a specific care situation.
methodsUsing a descriptive research design, we conducted one-on-one qualitative interviews with 23 patients who had undergone urostomy. The interview time for each patient lasted over 60 min. All the interviewees emphasized that urostomy had significantly influenced their sexual experience. Moreover, we used thematic analysis to analyze the data.
resultAll the interviewees emphasized that a urostomy had significantly influenced their sexual experience. Our analysis yielded three primary themes: (1) the tearing of care responsibility and self-life, (2) reconstruction of family roles and relationships, and (3) the contradiction between the best care and practical limitations, and eight subthemes: guilt of giving up, social alienation, sacrifice of physical and mental health, the challenge of intimacy, balance of multiple responsibilities, great economic pressure, limited knowledge and skills, and emotional collapse.
conclusionThis study reveals that family carers of Chinese urostomy patients perceive caregiving as a moral obligation rather than a mere action, viewing self-sacrifice as evidence of virtue within a Confucian ethical framework. Hence, providers must develop culturally sensitive assessment tools, redesign supportive interventions respecting diverse moral perspectives, and establish ethical support systems to bridge understanding between differing moral contexts. This might foster a healthcare system that genuinely honors the carers' moral dignity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42250123What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.