ArticleEnvironmental management2026
Conservation Planning and Reporting Implications of qPCR-based Multi-species eDNA Detection Under EU Environmental Regulations.
Article in Environmental management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Environmental DNA: From Promise to Practice.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
European Union (EU) legislation supports the conservation of endangered freshwater species through the Habitats Directive (HD, 92/43/EEC) and the Water Framework Directive (WFD, 2000/60/EC), and the eradication of Invasive Alien Species (IAS) through the Regulation 1143/2014. Periodic monitoring and reporting on the species listed in these regulations are mandatory for EU Member States. Quantitative PCR environmental DNA (qPCR eDNA) based approaches offer a new cost-effective and sensitive tool that could contribute to these monitoring obligations and to spatial conservation planning. We analysed the results from a qPCR eDNA simultaneous survey of 11 endangered species, four IAS, one pathogen fungus and one translocated fish at 53 central-Italian freshwater sites to produce three scores that could be used to prioritize areas of intervention based on the cumulative presence of native and alien species and their prevalence and co-occurrence. For each site, we proposed a Prioritizing Protection Score (PPS), a Prioritizing Eradication Score (PES), and a Benthic Invertebrates and Fish Score (BIFS) in accordance with HD, Regulation 1143/2014, and WFD. PPS prioritized 39 sites eligible for Natura 2000 designation to achieve the EU target of 30% protected land, PES identified 22 sites for IAS eradication and management, whereas BIFS highlighted 33 sites where freshwater evaluations can benefit from eDNA surveys. Results from the qPCR eDNA survey also revealed 53 new grid cells of occurrence of IAS and species listed in Annexes II, IV and V of HD that will contribute to the next reporting for both the HD and the IAS Regulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.