Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42250093›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of pediatrics2026

Emerging Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Care.

Thimiri Palani Murugan, Sutharson Ramasamy, Kurien Anil Kuruvilla

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thimiri Palani MuruganDepartment of Pediatrics, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sutharson RamasamyDepartment of Neonatology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Kurien Anil KuruvillaDepartment of Neonatology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India. anilkdj@hotmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies such as machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), predictive analytics and other tools are rapidly changing pediatric health care, using large amounts of health data. AI tools aid in triage, real-time monitoring and risk stratification in acute care settings, towards improving overall outcomes and fewer complications. During newborn resuscitation, AI analyses real-time data, can guide decisions and enhance training. Computer vision systems with AI tools can generate reliable neonatal bilirubin estimates without the need for blood sampling. AI technology is also being used in the management of necrotising enterocolitis, respiratory distress syndrome, and screening and early diagnosis of retinopathy of prematurity. ML models assist in detecting brain injuries on MRI for conditions such as hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, intraventricular hemorrhage; MRI biomarkers can be analyzed using AI to predict neurodevelopmental outcomes. AI-based clinical decision support systems have been deployed to enhance workflows and outcomes by early detection of disease, reducing medication errors and help clinicians improve decision-making. However, there remain ethical and practical challenges in the use of AI including data privacy, the need for high-quality pediatric datasets, rigorous clinical validation and transparency, to ensure that AI strengthens clinical judgement and is trustworthy.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligencePediatricsChildDecision Support Systems, ClinicalHumansInfant, NewbornMachine LearningArtificial intelligenceClinical decision supportDeep learningMachine learning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.