ArticleAnatomical science international2026
Assessing the relative length of the metacarpal and metatarsal bones of prehistoric Jomon, Yayoi, and modern Japanese.
Article in Anatomical science international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Prior studies have reported that Jomon populations exhibit relatively longer distal limb segments (radius and tibia) than their proximal counterparts (humerus and femur) from the Yayoi period onward. However, it remains unclear whether similar intergroup differences exist in the relative lengths of more distal elements, such as metacarpals and metatarsals. This study examined 256 individuals representing the Jomon, Yayoi, and modern Japanese populations, comparing the relative lengths of metacarpals against the humerus and radius, as well as metatarsals against the femur and tibia. The results indicated that, compared to the Yayoi and modern Japanese groups, Jomon individuals consistently had longer metacarpals and metatarsals relative to the humerus and femur. In contrast, no consistent intergroup differences were observed in the relative lengths of the metacarpals and metatarsals relative to the radius and tibia. Additionally, regarding the ratio of the radius to the second through fifth metacarpals, females across populations generally exhibited longer metacarpals than males. These findings suggest that the relative lengths of the metacarpals and metatarsals to the proximal limb segments, similar to the proximal-distal limb segment ratios, may reflect the combined effects of climatic background, population history, and sex-specific morphological variation patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42250061What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.