ArticleMagma (New York, N.Y.)2026
A generative adversarial network incorporating dual attention mechanisms for the segmentation of knee bone and cartilage.
Article in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe accurate segmentation of bone and cartilage is important for knee joint assessment. However, the complex shapes of both tissues make segmentation challenging. In this study, a conditional generative adversarial network incorporating dual attention mechanisms is proposed to enhance the segmentation accuracy of bone and cartilage. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe generator (a U-Net) integrates coupling attention mechanisms: squeeze-and-excitation in both the downsampling and upsampling paths, and the attention gate in skip connections, to focus on small tissue regions effectively. The discriminator (a convolutional neural network) fuses feature information from different layers of the generator. The proposed method was trained and tested using images from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) database. The training set and testing set consisted of 70 and 30 subjects, respectively.
resultsThe experimental results demonstrated that the proposed method achieved satisfactory segmentation performance for four types of tissues: the femur, tibia, femoral cartilage, and tibial cartilage. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) values of these tissues were 97.4%, 97.2%, 91.2%, and 88.9%, respectively. Compared with using only GAN, the DSC of femoral cartilage and tibial cartilage increased by 6.9 and 1.7%, respectively. DISCUSSION: By integrating squeeze-and-excitation and attention gate, the network achieved a notable improvement in segmentation accuracy for knee cartilage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42250047What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.