Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42250004›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2026

Modality-specific consolidation shapes long-term retention in statistical learning.

Anqi Hu, Kaitlyn M A Parks, Samantha E Schulz, Stephanie M H Larmer, Laura J Batterink, Ryan A Stevenson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anqi HuDepartment of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada. ahu233@uwo.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2675-1251
Kaitlyn M A ParksDepartment of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4360-626X
Samantha E SchulzDepartment of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3458-3617
Stephanie M H LarmerDepartment of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-5266-4039
Laura J BatterinkDepartment of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6879-4666
Ryan A StevensonDepartment of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1037-7736

Funding

Canadian Foundation for Innovation John R. Evans Leaders Fund 37497CIHR Project Grant 487850NSERC Discovery Grant RGPIN-2024-06233SSHRC Insight Grant 435-2017-0936SSHRC Insight Grant 435-2026-1197
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals routinely learn patterns from sights and sounds, yet it remains unclear how memories of those patterns compare across senses over time. Statistical learning, the implicit detection and extraction of patterns from continuous input, has been documented across sensory modalities, but most work has focused on immediate learning in unisensory contexts. This study, using a within-subject design, directly compared 24-hour consolidation trajectories of auditory, visual, and audiovisual statistical learning. Twenty-six young adults completed three statistical learning tasks across auditory, visual, and audiovisual modalities. In each task, participants were exposed to a continuous stream of stimuli with embedded triplet patterns. Learning of these patterns was tested immediately after exposure and again 24 h later. Across immediate and delayed tests, multisensory exposure yielded higher accuracy than unisensory exposure, demonstrating a robust multisensory-over-unisensory advantage. In contrast, only auditory statistical learning showed overnight gains, whereas visual and multisensory learning remained stable, suggesting a consolidation advantage for auditory input. Cross-task correlations, both at immediate test and for consolidation magnitudes, were weak, suggesting substantial modality-specific contributions to statistical learning. These findings provide the first evidence that multisensory input boosts long-term retention of learned patterns, and the consolidation of these patterns operates in a modality-specific manner.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionLearningMemory ConsolidationRetention, PsychologyVisual PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationYoung AdultConsolidationImplicit learningMultisensoryRetentionStatistical learning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.