ReviewQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2026
Response shifting: a qualitative meta-synthesis on response shift.
Review in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis qualitative meta-synthesis aimed to (1) describe health-related studies that examined response shift using qualitative methods, and (2) synthesize the qualitative results about response shift.
methodsWe systematically searched MEDLINE, PSYCINFO, CINAHL, EMBASE, Social Science Citation Index, and Dissertations and Theses Global to identify health-related studies using qualitative and mixed methods designs to examine response shift (n = 2221). Findings were classified using constant targeted comparison and "imported concepts" (e.g., recalibration).
resultsOf 1010 records screened, 33 had full-text screening; 14 were included, 10 of which used patient-reported outcome measures as part of their qualitative methods. Six studies specified a qualitative methodology. All of the 14 studies inferred evidence of response shift. Recalibration evidence was related to comparisons to previous health states or to others with poorer health; pre-existing expectations of current health; and adjustment of their quality of life standard. Reprioritization evidence was related to shifting life priorities to compensate for changing health status and forced changes in goals/priorities due to severity of treatment effects. Reconceptualization evidence was associated with changes in participants' health conditions and/or treatment and commonly co-occurred with reprioritization highlighting their interconnectedness. Authors of 10 studies noted possible alternative explanations of response shift, including: recall bias, incapacity of verbalizing experiences/feelings, irrelevant stimuli, and response bias, none of which ruled out concurrent occurrence of response shift.
conclusionFuture work is needed to engage in dialogue about how multiple lenses towards inquiry and analysis may be leveraged to examine the multiplicity of ways in which people experience change in meaning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.