ArticlePsychological research2026
The sense of agency is reduced by stimulus variability but has a limited effect on perceived variability.
Article in Psychological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Research has shown that the sense of agency depends on various sources of information and can influence other cognitive processes such as visual attention and memory. This study examines whether stimulus variability is another factor that either influences or is influenced by the sense of agency. Stimulus variability reflects environmental uncertainty, which is closely linked to the sense of agency. We hypothesized that a reduced sense of agency increases perceived variability and that higher stimulus variability diminishes the sense of agency. Participants in four experiments moved 40 circle stimuli for 3 s, with a 1 s delay introduced in half the trials to reduce the sense of agency. In Experiments 1-3, color variability was manipulated. Participants reported the perceived color variability (Experiment 1), their sense of agency (Experiment 3), or both (Experiment 2). While the delay manipulation did not influence perceived color variability, color variability reduced the agency ratings. Notably, the effect of color variability emerged only when participants reported both perceived color variability and their agency ratings (Experiment 2), and it disappeared when the color variability was task-irrelevant (Experiment 3). Experiment 4 extended this design to motion-direction variability, and a similar pattern was observed where direction variability reduced the agency ratings but the delay had no effect on perceived direction variability. Together, these results suggest that stimulus variability can influence the sense of agency in a unidirectional manner and that this effect is modulated by the task relevancy of variability information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42249972What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.