ArticleSurgery today2026
Textbook outcome after minimally invasive pulmonary resection for clinical stage I lung cancer: A retrospective cohort study.
Article in Surgery today, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to assess the textbook outcomes (TO) after minimally invasive lung cancer surgery and identify factors associated with TO failure.
methodsThis retrospective study included 853 patients with clinical stage I lung cancer who underwent minimally invasive resection between 2015 and 2025 at our institution. TO was defined using predefined perioperative events. A logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the factors associated with TO failure. Cause-specific mortality was evaluated using a competing risk analysis.
resultsOf the 853 patients, 647 (75.8%) achieved TO. Prolonged air leaks, reintervention, arrhythmia, prolonged hospital stay, and pneumonia were the main factors associated with TO failure. Smoking history and respiratory comorbidities were independent risk factors for TO failure. Segmentectomy was associated with a higher likelihood of achieving TO in the present study. At 5 years, no significant difference in the incidence of cancer-related death was observed between the TO and non-TO groups (5.4% vs. 4.2%, P = 0.841). However, the incidence of noncancer-related death was significantly higher in the non-TO group (13.5% vs. 10.5%, P = 0.004).
conclusionTO was achieved in most patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery. TO failure was significantly associated with a smoking history, respiratory comorbidities, surgical procedures, and an increased incidence of noncancer-related death after minimally invasive surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42249906What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.