ArticleEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2026
Subclinical and attenuated negative symptoms in the prediction of psychosis in children and adolescents: sample composition matters.
Article in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Basic symptoms of psychosis-from historical foundations to current evidence.Neuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In children and adolescents, subjective and attenuated negative symptoms were hypothesized to best differentiate clinical-high risk for psychosis (CHR-P) from other conditions, and to be most predictive of psychosis. To examine this, we analysed data from 8-17-year-old CHR-P in-/outpatients (n = 183), and inpatients not clinically suspected of developing psychosis (n = 277) based on cross-sectional and two-year naturalistic follow-up data from a Swiss-German study. CHR-P criteria and other symptoms were assessed using the Schizophrenia Proneness Instrument, Child & Youth version, and the Structured Interview for Psychosis-Risk Syndromes. Pairwise comparisons, two-step cluster analyses and Cox regression models were applied to identify cluster profiles and the best predictors of psychosis. In pairwise comparisons, cognitive and perceptive basic symptoms, and attenuated positive symptoms better distinguished CHR-P patients from non-CHR-P patients and converters from non-converters than the negative symptom subscales "Adynamia" and "Negative symptoms. In the stable two-cluster solution of patients scoring high (n = 338) and low (n = 122) on all scales, "Adynamia" was most important (importance = 1.0) whereby the high-scorer cluster included most of CHR-P (86.9%) and converters (84.6%), and was predictive of psychosis. Cox models of subscales differed in the selected predictors depending on the analysed samples (total sample, CHR-P and ultra-high risk only (UHR)), whereby the earlier report of "Negative symptoms" predicting conversion in UHR was replicated when only SIPS subscales were considered. While our findings partially support the significance of subjective and attenuated negative symptoms in CHR-P and psychosis prediction, they also suggest that the role of negative symptoms is highly dependent on sample composition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42249902What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.