ReviewEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2026
The role of the family in youth psychiatric readmission: a scoping review.
Review in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Youth post-discharge recovery and family adjustment after inpatient mental health treatment - study protocol for the longitudinal mixed-methods ReCoVer study.Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Repeated admissions of children and adolescents after inpatient psychiatric treatment point to underrecognized issues in the post-discharge period. The family environment is a promising target for sustained recovery. However, recent systematic reviews on predictors of psychiatric readmission in children and adolescents were unable to synthesize most family-level factors due to conceptual and methodological differences. To address this, we conducted a scoping review following PRISMA-ScR guidelines to (a) synthesize literature on family-related structural and process variables associated with youth psychiatric readmission and (b) identify conceptual and methodological gaps. We included primary and secondary studies in English or German language examining family-related constructs in relation to inpatient readmission. Eighty-three reports retrieved via a multi-tiered search strategy (including PubMed, PsycInfo, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, and Google Scholar) were included (79 empirical studies, three study protocols, and one meta-analytic review). Empirical studies have increased in recent years, were primarily conducted in the United States, and largely relied on retrospective or record-based data. Evidence was concentrated on structural characteristics. Among the examined constructs, results linked readmission to indicators of structurally burdened or disrupted caregiving environments (e.g., institutional or foster care), family psychiatric problems (e.g., history of or current psychopathology), and treatment involvement. In contrast, research on specific family processes remains sparse despite their established significance in adult populations. Findings support the relevance of various family factors for youth psychiatric readmission but highlight gaps regarding complex associations, short-term risks, and prospective studies of family processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42249901What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.