Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42249714›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2026

Shifts in the vaginal microbiota of nulliparous ewe lambs following initial reproductive handling and estrus synchronization.

Edgar L Reinoso-Peláez, Ignacia Beltrán De Heredia, María Saura, Carmen González, Manuel Ramón, Magdalena Serrano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Edgar L Reinoso-PeláezDepartamento de Mejora Genética Animal, Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA-CSIC), Madrid, 28040, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5918-5447
Ignacia Beltrán De HerediaInstituto Vasco de Investigación y Desarrollo Agrario, Alianza Vasca para la Investigación y la Tecnología (Neiker-BRTA), Vitoria-Gasteiz, 01080, Spain.
María SauraDepartamento de Mejora Genética Animal, Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA-CSIC), Madrid, 28040, Spain.
Carmen GonzálezDepartamento de Mejora Genética Animal, Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA-CSIC), Madrid, 28040, Spain.
Manuel RamónDepartamento de Mejora Genética Animal, Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA-CSIC), Madrid, 28040, Spain.
Magdalena SerranoDepartamento de Mejora Genética Animal, Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA-CSIC), Madrid, 28040, Spain.

Funding

Basque Institute for Agricultural Research and Development (NEIKER-BRTA) RTI-2018-096487-R-C33Centro de Supercomputación de Galicia (CESGA)CSIC 2022AEP004Fondos FEDER PRE2019-090087Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidadesthe Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current knowledge of the ovine vaginal microbiota is limited to adult ewes, leaving the bacterial community of nulliparous ewes and its dynamics during their first reproductive handling undefined. This study aimed to characterize the vaginal microbiota of ewe lambs prior to their first breeding and to evaluate the changes caused by routine handling and estrus synchronization. A total of 66 vaginal samples were collected from 22 nulliparous Latxa ewe lambs at three time points: baseline, post-handling, and post-estrus synchronization using intravaginal devices containing oxytetracycline. Bacterial composition was characterized by sequencing the V3-V4 hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA gene. Data were processed using DADA2 to infer Amplicon Sequence Variants, and ecological shifts were evaluated through beta and alpha diversity metrics, alongside differential abundance analysis with ANCOM-BC2. A baseline community was revealed, with high diversity and inter-individual variability. This initial state was dominated by the phylum Firmicutes and showed a strong connection to the gut microbiota, including enteric genera such as Fibrobacter, Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group, and Lachnospiraceae NK3A20 group. The first physical examination caused a significant shift in community structure (beta diversity P = 0.001), marked by a rapid drop in these gut-associated bacteria and an increase in opportunistic genera such as Trueperella (log2FC = 2.18; Padj < 0.05). The subsequent synchronization treatment further reduced both alpha and beta diversity, creating a uniform environment where genera such as Aerococcus, Corynebacterium, Finegoldia, and Trueperella increased, while Alistipes, Acinetobacter, and Jeotgalicoccus decreased (Padj < 0.05). Despite these changes, the cohort achieved an 89% pregnancy rate via natural mating. Routine handling and synchronization protocols induce temporary shifts in the vaginal microbiota, decreasing diversity and promoting some opportunistic genera. Crucially, the high fertility rate achieved suggests that these ecological alterations are compatible with successful conception under natural mating conditions.

Indexed as

Estrus SynchronizationMicrobiotaVaginaAnimalsBacteriaFemaleParityPregnancyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSheepRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNA sequencingestrus synchronizationnulliparous ewesreproductive managementvaginal microbiota

Identifiers

PMID42249714
PMCPMC13344839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.