ArticleAnaesthesia2026
Prospective development and validation of an objective classification for difficult facemask ventilation: the MASCAN score.
Article in Anaesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDifficult facemask ventilation is an entity that lacks a robust definition, leading to inconsistent identification in clinical practice and research. The aim of this study was to develop and validate an objective classification and numeric score for difficult facemask ventilation.
methodsFour hundred patients who required tracheal intubation for ear, nose and throat or maxillofacial surgery participated in this prospective single centre study. After induction of anaesthesia, facemask ventilation was attempted using pressure-controlled mechanical ventilation. The primary outcome was difficult facemask ventilation documented as an alert in the patient health records. An independent observer assessed for potential indicators of difficult facemask ventilation: two-handed grip; oral airway use; jaw thrust; senior consultant anaesthetist taking over; conversion to manual rescue ventilation; peripheral oxygen saturation drop; tidal volume; and leak fraction.
resultsDifficult facemask ventilation occurred in 43 (10.8%) patients. Five eligible indicators were selected by cross-validated least absolute shrinkage selector operator regression and used to develop a multivariable logistic regression model (MASCAN model) and score (MASCAN score). These indicators were: two-handed grip; oral airway use; jaw thrust; tidal volume ≤ 2 ml.kg DISCUSSION: The MASCAN score is an objective, data-driven classification for difficult facemask ventilation with clearly defined thresholds that may improve airway documentation and inform future airway management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.