Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42249628›Full record

SynthesisAlcohol, clinical & experimental research2026

A Systematic Review of International Guidelines for Addressing Alcohol Use Disorder in Pregnancy.

Caroline B Cary, Emily O B Hynes, Mishka Terplan, Kelly A McNamara, Vitor S Tardelli, Thiago M Fidalgo, Jennifer K Bello, Michelle Doering, Richard A Grucza, Hendrée E Jones and 5 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Alcohol, clinical & experimental research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Caroline B CaryDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7396-0446
Emily O B HynesInstitute for Drug and Alcohol Studies, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0559-5335
Mishka TerplanFriends Research Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2489-2942
Kelly A McNamaraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Gosford Hospital, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7512-1072
Vitor S TardelliDepartment of Psychiatry, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6040-7708
Thiago M FidalgoDepartamento de Psiquiatria da Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3555-5228
Jennifer K BelloDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1310-2826
Michelle DoeringBecker Medical Library, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6664-8924
Richard A GruczaDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8191-6875
Hendrée E JonesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6180-8642
Ryan DuggalDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, UCSF School of Medicine, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7061-4114
Jeannie C KellyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4908-4693
Silvia S MartinsDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3059-9993
Caitlin E MartinInstitute for Drug and Alcohol Studies, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5560-458X
Kevin Young XuWashington University School of Public Health, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6595-695X

Funding

Adaptation and Refinement of a Clinically Applicable Phenotypic Battery to Individualize Opioid Use Disorder Treatment for Women Through the Postpartum PeriodK23DA053507 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI MARTIN, CAITLIN EILEEN · 2021 to 2025
$1.0M
A Preconception Health Intervention to Reduce Substance Exposed Pregnancies among Incarcerated WomenK23DA053433 · NIDA · SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY · PI Jennifer Bello Kottenstette · 2022 to 2026
$873k
Using Big Data to Optimize Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder in PregnancyK08DA061258 · NIDA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Kevin Young Xu · 2024 to 2026
$664k
NIDA NIH HHS K08 DA061258NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA053433NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA053507NIH HHS K08 DA061258NIH HHS K23 DA053507
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite well-documented harms of prenatal alcohol exposure, evidence-based treatment guidelines for alcohol use disorder (AUD) during pregnancy remain limited. We systematically reviewed international clinical practice guidelines to examine how they address the full cascade of AUD care during pregnancy, including diagnosis, engagement, treatment initiation, and retention. We searched over 40 clinical practice guideline databases (including PubMed and Guidelines International Network) and gray literature sources globally, identifying 1045 records. Using the Population, Interventions, Comparators, Attributes, Recommendation Characteristics (PICAR) framework, we evaluated guidelines from medical organizations in English-speaking nations addressing alcohol use and AUD management in pregnancy. Our final analysis included 18 guidelines from the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia/New Zealand, and the World Health Organization published from 2014 to the present. Two reviewers independently assessed each guideline using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation-Recommendations Excellence (AGREE-REX) framework to evaluate quality and risk of bias. We used narrative synthesis to summarize findings across key concepts and care cascade stages. Nearly all guidelines (94%) described risks of alcohol exposure and recommended counseling on cessation (89%), yet few extended beyond these early cascade stages. Only 44% mentioned medications for AUD (MAUD), and merely 17% discussed specific psychosocial treatments. Among guidelines addressing MAUD, only one cautiously supported use, while three explicitly recommended against it. Most guidelines (61%) ended treatment recommendations at referral to specialty care, with half limiting guidance to acute alcohol withdrawal management. Taken together, our findings reveal a stark misalignment between screening emphasis and treatment guidance. While guidelines consistently recommend universal screening and brief intervention, they provide minimal actionable frameworks for managing AUD throughout pregnancy. This gap leaves clinicians without evidence-based pathways for comprehensive AUD treatment during the prenatal period, highlighting an urgent need to strengthen both the evidence base and clinical guidance for AUD management in pregnancy.

Indexed as

AlcoholismPractice Guidelines as TopicPregnancy ComplicationsFemaleHumansPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID42249628
PMCPMC13241750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.