ArticleCritical care explorations2026
Early Prone Positioning After Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Surgery for Moderate-to-Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Is Safe and Shortens Duration of Mechanical Ventilation.
Article in Critical care explorations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
importanceEvidence for prone positioning in post-cardiac surgery acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), especially after acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) repair, is extremely limited. Clinicians remain uncertain about its safety, feasibility, and the optimal timing of initiation in this hemodynamically vulnerable population.
objectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness and safety of prone positioning for moderate-to-severe ARDS (MS-ARDS) after ATAAD repair, and to determine whether early initiation (≤ 48 hr) provides additional clinical benefit. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsA retrospective, single-center cohort study conducted in a tertiary cardiovascular center. Seventy-eight adults with MS-ARDS after ATAAD surgery were included: 58 received prone positioning and 20 remained supine. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary outcomes were duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) and postoperative ICU length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes included hospital LOS, hospitalization cost, and 28- and 90-day mortality. Adverse events were systematically captured using prespecified hemodynamic and respiratory categories.
resultsPreoperative and perioperative characteristics were comparable between groups. In the prone cohort, the Pao2/Fio2 improved from 92.67 ± 21.04 to 152.45 ± 64.28 mm Hg at 4 hours (p < 0.001), demonstrating rapid oxygenation gain. Patients were further stratified by timing of intervention: early prone positioning (EPP: ≤ 48 hr from ARDS onset) and delayed prone positioning (DPP). EPP was associated with a significantly shorter duration of MV 5.03 ± 1.87 days compared with DPP 8.32 ± 4.73 days and the supine group 7.51 ± 4.08 days (p = 0.002). No increase in adverse events was observed, and no episodes of malignant arrhythmia or cardiac arrest occurred. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Prone positioning for MS-ARDS after ATAAD repair was feasible, safe, and rapidly improved oxygenation. Initiation within 48 hours was associated with a clinically meaningful reduction in ventilation duration. These findings support early, protocolized prone positioning in selected postoperative ATAAD patients and justify further evaluation in prospective trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.