ReviewBreast cancer research : BCR2026
Intraoperative measurement of breast-conserving surgery margins: surgical application.
Review in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is an effective treatment for early-stage cancer, provided that there is "no ink on tumor" reported in the excised breast specimen. However, approximately 15-35% of patients require additional surgery due to the presence of malignant cells at the surgical margin. In this review, we examine the available data on margin status in breast cancer and compare the advantages and disadvantages of different approaches in BCS margin evaluation. Of note, there are numerous concerns regarding traditional methods for assessing margins, and emerging technological approaches are gaining attention. The use of new imaging devices and molecular probes for surgical navigation represents a significant research direction for the future. Ultimately, collaboration between scientists from various fields is essential in reducing positive rates at breast-conserving margins and improving re-excision rates with associated poor outcomes, and ultimately decreasing recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.