ArticleBMC nursing2026
Survival over competence: a qualitative study of senior nursing students' clinical experiences in Karachi, Pakistan.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClinical placement is the cornerstone of nursing education. In Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) like Pakistan, the lack of affiliated teaching hospitals in private nursing colleges requires students to undertake clinical rotations in resource-constrained public facilities, shaping challenging learning environments. This study explores the clinical experiences, challenges, and coping strategies of senior undergraduate nursing students.
methodsAn exploratory descriptive qualitative design was employed, underpinned by Benner's from Novice to Expert theoretical framework. Data were collected through eight semi-structured focus group discussions (FGDs) with 59 Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN) students from three private nursing colleges in Karachi, Pakistan, using purposive maximum variation sampling. Data was analyzed using Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis.
resultsData were analysed using Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis, and Patricia Benner's Novice to Expert Model was applied as a guiding theoretical lens across the analysis; the integrated interpretation is presented in Fig. 1. The analysis revealed a profound disconnect between academic preparation and clinical reality, encapsulated in five major themes: (1) Systemic and Environmental Deficiencies, characterized by institutional neglect and severe resource scarcity leading to unsafe practices; (2) A Culture of Supervisory Neglect and Hostility, where students felt abandoned by instructors and devalued by hospital staff; (3) The Pervasive Theory-Practice Chasm, marked by the cognitive dissonance of witnessing normalized unsafe protocols; (4) The Crucible of Confidence, detailing the psychological toll on students and their development of resilience and "digital mentorship" as survival mechanisms; and (5) A Call for Systemic Reform, outlining student-driven recommendations for accountability and improved supervision.
conclusionsThe current model of clinical education for private college students in public hospitals in Karachi is fraught with systemic failures that compromise patient safety and student well-being. Students' progress toward competence is not through structured mentorship, but through resilience developed in a harsh, unsupported environment. Urgent reforms in regulatory oversight, preceptor training, and resource allocation are required to bridge the theory-practice gap and ensure safe clinical learning environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.