ArticleBMC health services research2026
Enhancing employee experience and workplace well-being in oncology: a bottom-up co-construction approach in healthcare institutions in Québec.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe commitment of health personnel in initiatives for improving their working conditions is recognised as a key condition for the success and the sustainability of such initiatives. Healthcare organisations are faced with the challenge of deploying strategies needed to mobilise this commitment. The objective of this article is to present the results of a qualitative evaluation of a bottom-up co-construction project aimed at engaging oncology staff in four Québec healthcare organisations in a process of transformation and improvement of their working environment.
methodsAs part of our constructivist approach, we utilised a qualitative method, which involved conducting one-on-one interviews and gathering documentary data, including survey results, to assess the development and implementation of an intervention across four oncology units. We conducted one-on-one interviews from January 26, 2023 to March 5, 2023 with 17 workers from different categories. We collected documentary data that cover the pre-implementation activities, the co-construction workshops, and the intervention implementation. All collected data were coded and analysed using QDA Miner 6.0, and our findings were validated iteratively throughout the project, involving regular interaction with participants.
resultsFourteen areas of vulnerability emerged across the four dimensions studied, and six were targeted by workers as priorities: emotional exhaustion; role conflict; ability to learn; leadership; team cohesion; and communication. Interventions developed to address the prioritised areas included: co-development workshops; training sessions aimed at enhancing workers' control over their working environment; team connectivity through professional and social activities; staffing and workload reviews; support from a psychosocial professional; and coaching. According to workers, most improvements occurred in two targeted areas, team cohesion and communication, even in the units where these issues were not prioritised at first. Participants pinpointed some factors that facilitated the implementation of the intervention and its impact (engagement, organisational support, the bottom-up approach) and others that created constraints (staff shortages, conflicting priorities, level of commitment).
conclusionsThis exploratory work offers insightful perspectives on how a bottom-up co-construction approach can serve as a lever to engage workers to improve their work experience. It may inspire other healthcare organisations, both in oncology and in other fields of activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.