Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42249438›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2026

The association between cognitive flexibility and creativity across childhood and adolescence: a scoping review.

Kastoori Kalaivanan, Rui Wang, Jiani Ren, Mengquan Liu, Xueni Zhang, Chew Lee Teo, S H Annabel Chen

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kastoori Kalaivanan *Centre for Research and Development in Learning (CRADLE), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9213-3203
Rui Wang *Centre for Research and Development in Learning (CRADLE), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore. rw623@cantab.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8186-4254
Jiani RenCentre for Research and Development in Learning (CRADLE), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-2801-3929
Mengquan LiuDepartment of Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-8419-9261
Xueni ZhangCentre for Research and Development in Learning (CRADLE), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3417-7042
Chew Lee TeoNational Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3526-3260
S H Annabel ChenCentre for Research and Development in Learning (CRADLE), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1540-5516

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive flexibility (CF), the ability to adaptively shift between perspectives, ideas, or strategies, is increasingly recognised as an important executive function underlying creativity. Creativity broadly refers to the capacity to generate ideas or solutions that are both unique and suitable to a given context. A positive association between CF and creativity is well-documented in adults. However, evidence from childhood and adolescence, which are developmental periods characterised by heightened neuroplasticity and the maturation of executive control, remains fragmented. This is largely due to substantial methodological heterogeneity across studies. This scoping review synthesises empirical studies published in the past decade that examine the association between CF and creativity in individuals aged 0-18 years. Specifically, it examines: (1) how CF and creativity have been conceptualised and measured in this age group; (2) whether there is an association between CF and creativity; and (3) whether this association varies across preschoolers, school-going children, and adolescents. Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria for the scoping review. Definitions and measurement approaches varied widely, spanning performance-based tasks and self‑report instruments. Nine of the studies found a significant positive association between CF and creativity, particularly when CF was assessed as a complex, multifaceted construct and when creativity was assessed by traditional tools. In contrast, five studies reported null or inconsistent findings; these studies often employed narrow task-switching paradigms or creativity tasks incorporating other cognitive demands (e.g., reasoning). Importantly, no consistent age‑related differences were identified in the CF-creativity association. The results combined suggest that creativity may rely more on higher-level, strategic forms of CF that support the integration and exploration of ideas, rather than on simple rule-switching ability. By consolidating existing evidence and highlighting key conceptual and methodological gaps, this review offers a clear direction for future research to take when investigating the association between CF and creativity across developmental stages.

Indexed as

Adolescent DevelopmentChild DevelopmentCognitive FlexibilityCreativityAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolHumansAdolescentChild developmentCognitive flexibilityCreativity

Identifiers

PMID42249438
PMCPMC13455145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.