ArticleBMC medical education2026
Service learning in dental education: enhancing student competence through an oral health training programme for children with autism spectrum disorder.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundService learning integrates community service with academic instruction, fostering reflective practice and enhancing professional competencies. In dental education, traditional curricula often emphasize technical skills over humanistic care, particularly for vulnerable populations such as children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). This study designed and evaluated a structured service learning programme to explore its association with changes in dental students' oral health knowledge, self-efficacy, and professional attitudes toward serving children, especially those with ASD.
methodsIn 2025, 102 fourth-year dental students participated in a single-group pretest-posttest study of a service learning programme focused on oral health for children with ASD. The programme included six modules: theoretical training, field investigation, data analysis, report writing, the development of educational materials, and health education delivery. Pre- and post-programme assessments measured changes in knowledge, self-efficacy, and professional attitudes via a 9-item knowledge test, a 6-item 5-point Likert scale, and a 6-item self-rated scale (0-100), respectively. Course feedback was collected via four dichotomous items. Statistical analyses included generalized estimating equations for knowledge test scores, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests for Attitudes and willingness, and paired t-tests for self-efficacy scores; a two-tailed p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
resultsSignificant improvements were observed in students' knowledge (correct understanding of Community periodontal index (CPI) probing increased from 65.7% to 92.9% (rate difference = 27.3%, 95%CI: 16.5 to 38.1, p < 0.001), self-efficacy (understanding of ASD oral hygiene rose from 32.27 ± 8.37 to 43.89 ± 2.73 (mean difference = 43.06, 95%CI: 37.01 to 49.12, p < 0.001), and professional empathy (93.5% of students reported enhanced empathy and responsibility). More than 87% of the students endorsed the expansion of this educational model.
conclusionFindings from this study suggest that service learning can be associated with the integration of knowledge, skills, and humanistic values in dental education. This model may help prepare students to address the oral health needs of underserved populations and may support the role transformation from learner to health advocate. Pending further validation with more rigorous designs, it offers a potential framework for training in special care dentistry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.