Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42249363›Full record

ArticleBMC urology2026

Perioperative complications of laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus sacrocolpopexy with subtotal hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse.

Shada Alanazi, Najd Alshammari, Arwa Jrais, Nawal Alharbi, Mai Alsaadoon, Yaseer Alanazi, Jawaher Alsahabi

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shada AlanaziCollege of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Najd AlshammariKing Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Arwa JraisKing Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Nawal AlharbiDepartment Urogynecology & Reconstructive Female Pelvic Surgery, King Abdul-Aziz Medical City, King Saud Ben Abdu Aziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS), Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Riyadh, 22490, Saudi Arabia.
Mai AlsaadoonCollege of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Yaseer AlanaziCollege of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Jawaher AlsahabiKing Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Jaalsahabi@kfmc.med.sa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPelvic organ prolapse (POP) affects 23.4% of women in Saudi Arabia. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy is the established surgical gold standard; however, whether concomitant hysterectomy confers additional perioperative risk remains debated.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study included 179 women who underwent laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with subtotal hysterectomy (n = 119) or laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy (n = 60) at two tertiary referral centers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, between 2009 and 2024. Intraoperative and postoperative complications, perioperative hemoglobin change, and hospital stay duration were compared between groups.

resultsThe sacrocolpopexy group was significantly older (P = 0.004). Organ injury occurred in 0.6% of cases overall. Blood transfusion was required exclusively in the sacrohysteropexy group (3.3% vs. 0.0%, P = 0.045). Both groups demonstrated a statistically significant postoperative hemoglobin decline - sacrocolpopexy: 124.52 ± 15.07 to 110.60 ± 13.77 g/L; sacrohysteropexy: 125.27 ± 13.20 to 110.29 ± 12.18 g/L (P < 0.001) - with no significant between-group difference (P = 0.747) and neither decline reaching clinical significance. Sacrohysteropexy was associated with shorter hospitalization (44.6% vs. 24.6% discharged within two postoperative days, P = 0.012). Reoperation rates and symptom resolution were comparable between groups.

conclusionsNo significant between-group differences in perioperative morbidity were detected. Sacrohysteropexy was associated with shorter hospital stay; however, the clinical relevance of the higher transfusion rate is uncertain, given the small event count. Given baseline group non-comparability and the retrospective design, these results should be regarded as exploratory. The surgical approach should be individualized based on patient characteristics and the surgeon's expertise. Prospective randomized trials are warranted.

Indexed as

Gynecologic Surgical ProceduresHysterectomyIntraoperative ComplicationsLaparoscopyPelvic Organ ProlapsePostoperative ComplicationsAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLength of StayMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesCervicopexyComplicationsHysteropexyLaparoscopicMiddle eastPelvic organ prolapseSubtotal hysterectomy

Identifiers

PMID42249363
PMCPMC13465000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.