ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026
Early prediction of sepsis in the ICU: a comparative analysis of multiple machine-learning algorithms using the MIMIC-III database.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sepsis is a high-burden, highly heterogeneous clinical challenge that affects up to 30% of ICU patients. Reliable early prediction is essential for timely intervention and improved outcomes. We aimed to develop and validate a machine-learning model for predicting sepsis onset beyond the first 24 h of ICU admission. Data from septic patients were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III) database. Feature selection was performed with the Boruta algorithm. Nine algorithms-XGBoost-DART, Gaussian Naïve Bayes, LightGBM-DART, Random Forest, AdaBoost, Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), Support Vector Machine (SVM-RBF), k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Ridge Regression-were trained and comprehensively evaluated with respect to discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility. Class imbalance was addressed using SMOTE on the training set and cost-sensitive learning for applicable algorithms. Among 1,634 ICU patients included (after excluding those meeting Sepsis-3 criteria within the first 24 h), 349 (21.4%) developed sepsis after the 24-hour observation window. AUROCs ranged from 0.794 to 0.881 across the nine models. AUROCs ranged from 0.810 to 0.895 across the nine models. XGBoost-DART achieved the highest AUROC (0.881, 95% CI: 0.854-0.908) along with the best accuracy (0.847), F1-score (0.762), and specificity (0.897). Decision-curve analysis demonstrated that XGBoost-DART delivered the greatest net benefit over the widest range of threshold probabilities, underscoring its strong clinical utility. In summary, machine-learning models provide a reliable tool for early sepsis prediction in the ICU. The XGBoost-DART model, with its outstanding performance, empowers clinicians to identify high-risk patients and initiate timely interventions to reduce mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.