ArticleBMC medical imaging2026
Deformable image registration accuracy: impact of user-defined parameter selection on contour propagation for deep inspiration breath-hold and free breathing breast radiotherapy.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDeformable Image Registration (DIR) is increasingly used in breast radiotherapy planning, but the impact of different parameter settings on clinical accuracy remains unclear. This study systematically evaluates how focus region selection and registration direction affect DIR performance, providing evidence-based recommendations for clinical implementation. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe analyzed 73 patients with left-sided breast cancer who underwent both free breathing (FB) and deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) planning CT scans. Clinical target volume (CTV), heart, left anterior descending artery, and both lungs were retrospectively contoured by one radiation oncologist on both datasets. Deformable Image Registration was performed bidirectionally (FB↔DIBH) using four different approaches: no focus region, CTV-focused, heart-focused, and surgical clip-focused registration. Volume differences and Dice Similarity Index (DSI) were calculated to assess registration accuracy. Generalized estimating equations analyzed possible correlations.
resultsFocus region selection critically impacted DIR accuracy. CTV-focused registration achieved highest CTV overlap (DSI: 0.96 vs. 0.91 without focus, p < 0.005) but compromised other structures. Heart-focused registration optimized cardiac structure accuracy but reduced CTV precision. Registration direction showed minimal impact on volume differences but affected DSI values. Tidal volume significantly affected both CTV (p < 0.005) and heart DSI (p < 0.007), with opposite effects on each structure. Manual contour adjustment remained necessary in all cases regardless of parameter selection.
conclusionDIR performance in breast radiotherapy is highly dependent on user-defined parameters, with no single configuration optimizing all structures simultaneously. Focus region selection creates a trade-off between local accuracy and global registration quality. Clinical implementation requires structure-specific parameter optimization and mandatory manual review. These findings establish practical limitations and benefits of hybrid DIR algorithms for breast radiotherapy workflows and highlight the continued necessity of expert oversight.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.