Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42249330›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026

Assessment of prevalence, perceptions, and factors associated with reported history of caesarean section among women in the United Arab Emirates: a cross-sectional study.

Alantreesa Siby, Amal Shaji, Fathimath Shahza, Richu Elsa Shaju, Wajiha Ajmal, Nelofar Sami Khan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alantreesa SibyCollege of Medicine, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.
Amal ShajiCollege of Medicine, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.
Fathimath ShahzaCollege of Medicine, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.
Richu Elsa ShajuCollege of Medicine, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.
Wajiha AjmalThumbay University Hospital, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.
Nelofar Sami KhanCollege of Medicine, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates. neloferkhan@gmu.ac.ae.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCaesarean section (CS) is a life-saving intervention when medically indicated; however, its use has increased substantially worldwide, including in high-access healthcare settings. Emerging evidence suggests that women's perceptions, prior childbirth experiences, and counselling practices may contribute to persistently elevated CS rates. This study assessed the prevalence of reported history of CS and examined sociodemographic, health-system, and perception-related factors associated with prior CS among women in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

methodsA cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey was conducted among women aged ≥ 18 years residing in the UAE between February and October 2025. Data were collected using a structured self-administered questionnaire assessing sociodemographic characteristics, obstetric history, delivery-related perceptions, and factors influencing decision-making regarding mode of delivery. Analyses examining CS history were restricted to women with at least one prior delivery, and the outcome was defined as reporting at least one previous CS. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and multivariable binary logistic regression analyses were performed. Separate domain-specific regression models and an additional combined multivariable model were constructed to assess potential confounding between sociodemographic and perception-related variables.

resultsAmong 351 women with previous deliveries, 219 (62.4%) reported a history of at least one CS. The most commonly reported reasons for CS included foetal medical indications (28.3%), healthcare provider recommendation (18.7%), perceived foetal safety (18.7%), and fear of labour pain (16.0%). In the combined multivariable model, age ≥ 31 years (AOR 1.73; 95% CI 1.06-2.81) and undergraduate/postgraduate educational attainment (AOR 2.04; 95% CI 1.13-3.69) were independently associated with prior CS. Perception-related variables associated with prior CS included disagreement that vaginal delivery leads to better maternal recovery (AOR 18.50; 95% CI 2.37-144.51), disagreement that vaginal birth promotes better mother-baby bonding (AOR 2.37; 95% CI 1.28-4.38), and the belief that CS impacts infant immune outcomes (AOR 2.57; 95% CI 1.35-4.90). Women identified improved counselling from healthcare providers as the most important factor perceived to support better delivery-related decision-making.

conclusionsA reported history of CS was high within this UAE study sample. While most sociodemographic and health-system characteristics demonstrated limited independent association with prior CS, selected perception-related and experiential factors remained associated after adjustment. These findings suggest that in high-access healthcare settings, communication- and perception-related influences may contribute meaningfully to delivery-related preferences and experiences. Strengthening balanced, evidence-based, and woman-centred antenatal counselling may support informed decision-making regarding mode of delivery.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDecision MakingFemaleHumansPregnancyPrevalenceSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Arab EmiratesYoung AdultCaesarean sectionCross-sectional studyDelivery-related perceptionsMaternal counsellingMode of deliveryShared decision-makingUnited Arab EmiratesVaginal delivery

Identifiers

PMID42249330
PMCPMC13455162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.