ArticleBMC primary care2026
Primary care physicians' understanding and counseling practices of sexually transmitted diseases: a cross-sectional study in Saudi Arabia.
Article in BMC primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionSexually transmitted infections (STIs) remain a significant global health burden. In Saudi Arabia, limited awareness, stigma, and inconsistent provider competence impede effective prevention and counseling. This study aimed to assess primary care physicians' (PCPs) competence and physician perceived barriers (attitudes) in STI prevention and counseling across Saudi primary care.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted from July 2024 to July 2025 among PCPs in Saudi Arabia. Data were collected using a validated, self-administered electronic questionnaire through social media and official email lists. The survey collected sociodemographic data, STI-related practices (including risk assessment, counseling, and testing), and perceived barriers to care. Practices were scored as continuous variables using a 5-point Likert scale (Never to Always), while perceived barriers were assessed across five domains using a 5-point Likert scale (Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree) and subsequently dichotomized into 'high' or 'low' based on the median score. Descriptive statistics summarized responses, and non-parametric tests evaluated group differences. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with higher practice scores, while logisitc regression identified predictors of high perceived barriers. Both models included age, gender, years of experience, practice sector, and number of STI patient consultations as independant variables and confounders.
resultsA total of 133 physicians participated (55% male, 45% female); most were aged 36-45 years (40%) and practicing in primary healthcare centers (38%) or governmental hospitals (35%). Training in STI counseling was most often obtained during residency (38%), though 12% reported no formal training. Clinical exposure was limited, with 51% managing 1-5 STI cases in the past six months. Mean scores were 2.59 for risk assessment, 3.76 for counseling, 3.75 for testing, and 3.64 for attitudes. Multivariable analysis revealed that the absence of recent clinical exposure to STI cases (managing zero cases in the past 6 months) was significantly associated with a lower risk assessment (β = -0.888, p = 0.0031), testing (β = -0.951, p = 0.0024), and attitude scores (β = -0.281, p = 0.0319). Counseling scores were significantly higher among physicians with 16-20 years' experience (β = 1.333, p 0.0108).
conclusionPCPs in Saudi Arabia demonstrate moderate STI-related competence, with gaps in risk assessment and pervasive barriers to counseling. Targeted continuing education, structured training in sexual health, and standardized screening protocols are needed to enhance STI prevention and care in primary care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.