Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42249282›Full record

ArticleBMC gastroenterology2026

Training satisfaction, competency gaps and well-being in gastroenterology residency in Spain: results of a national SEPD survey.

Marisa Iborra, María Dolores Martín-Arranz, Judith Gómez-Camarero, Rafael Gómez-Rodríguez, Julio Iglesias-Garcia, Aitor Orive-Calzada, Luis Téllez, Federico Argüelles-Arias

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marisa IborraGastroenterology Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Avinguda de Fernando Abril Martorell, 106, Valencia, 46026, Spain. marisaiborra@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7360-7581
María Dolores Martín-ArranzDepartment of Gastroenterology, La Paz University Hospital. School of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. Institute for Health Research, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1872-0917
Judith Gómez-CamareroGastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Burgos, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4923-7466
Rafael Gómez-RodríguezDepartament of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-3006-2522
Julio Iglesias-GarciaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), A Coruña, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3517-329X
Aitor Orive-CalzadaBiobizkaia Health Research Institute. Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Galdakao-Usansolo University Hospital, Osakidetza, Bilbao, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3712-0431
Luis TéllezGastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal. IRYCIS. CIBERehd. Universidad de Alcalá, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9254-3891
Federico Argüelles-AriasFaculty of Medicine, Gastroenterology Department, University of Sevilla, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3646-8919

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the training experience, competency needs and professional wellbeing of Gastroenterology trainees in Spain, with a particular focus on factors associated with burnout.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study using an anonymous online survey distributed to residents (R1-R4) and young specialists (≤ 5 years after completing the training program). The survey collected information on training satisfaction, perceived competency gaps, working conditions, and burnout. Responses were collected using 5-point Likert scales. Descriptive analyses, subgroup comparisons and logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with burnout.

resultsA total of 241 responses were obtained (60.6% women; mean age 30.2 ± 3.6 years). Nearly all participants trained in university hospitals (97.5%) and most in tertiary centres (82.6%). Overall satisfaction with the training program was 3.99 ± 0.71/5, with practical training rated more favourably (4.25 ± 0.71) than theoretical training (3.30 ± 0.98). The main areas identified as needing reinforcement were clinical nutrition (26.0%), digestive ultrasonography (25.2%) and endoscopy (23.3%). Burnout was reported by 63.5% of respondents. Lack of adequate rest was strongly associated with higher burnout risk, while satisfaction with working conditions showed a protective effect, an association that remained significant in multivariate analysis. Additionally, 89.5% believed that an additional year would improve their preparation, and 97.1% considered that a five-year program would be sufficient to acquire the necessary competencies.

conclusionsWhile practical training is highly valued, gaps persist in theoretical education and key technical areas. Burnout is common and closely linked to insufficient rest and dissatisfaction with working conditions. The strong support for extending residency to five years suggests that this measure may not only enhance training quality but also promote wellbeing and a more balanced acquisition of competencies.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalClinical CompetenceGastroenterologyInternship and ResidencyJob SatisfactionPersonal SatisfactionAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePsychological Well-BeingSpainSurveys and QuestionnairesWorking ConditionsBurnoutCompetency-based medical educationGastroenterology Trainingmedical residency

Identifiers

PMID42249282
PMCPMC13459273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.