ReviewDiscover oncology2026
Exploring the functional role of XIST in breast cancer from mechanisms to clinical implications.
Review in Discover oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have emerged as pivotal regulators in cancer biology, with the X-inactive specific transcript (XIST) playing a particularly significant role in breast cancer development and progression. This review summarizes current insights into XIST's mechanistic roles, highlighting its involvement in intricate regulatory networks through interactions with microRNAs, transcription factors, and key signaling pathways. Furthermore, we explore its significant influence on critical aspects of tumor progression, including chemotherapy resistance, modulation of the tumor microenvironment, and regulation of cancer stem cells. Importantly, emerging evidence indicates that XIST functions are not uniform across breast cancer subtypes; rather, its expression patterns and biological effects appear to be context-dependent, varying between luminal and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) categories. While XIST is frequently associated with tumor-promoting activities, certain subtype-specific contexts suggest a more complex regulatory role, underscoring the need for stratified interpretation. By bridging mechanistic insights with clinical applications, we demonstrate XIST's considerable promise as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker and as a novel therapeutic target. In this review, we demonstrate that targeting XIST may offer a novel and effective therapeutic avenue, contributing to personalized treatment strategies and improved outcomes in breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.