Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42249224›Full record

ArticleHead and neck pathology2026

The SALV-Dataset Registry: An Expertly Curated Digital Clinicopathological Dataset for Salivary Gland Tumor Research and AI-Assisted Diagnostic Tools.

Kimberly S T Burghout, Jurre A J Weijer, Alize C Evers, Gerben E Breimer, Jeroen N van Rossem, Laura A N Peferoen, Elisabeth Bloemena, Sjors A Koppes, Vera van Dis, Robert M Verdijk and 17 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Head and neck pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Kimberly S T Burghout *Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. k.s.t.burghout@lumc.nl.
Jurre A J Weijer *Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Alize C EversDepartment of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Gerben E BreimerDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jeroen N van RossemDepartment of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Laura A N PeferoenDepartment of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Elisabeth BloemenaDepartment of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sjors A KoppesDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Vera van DisDepartment of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Robert M VerdijkDepartment of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Ilse van Engen-van GrunsvenDepartment of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Thom DoelemanDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Mari F C M van den HoutDepartment of Pathology, GROW-Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Bert van der VegtDepartment of Pathology, Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jan Johannes DoffDepartment of Pathology, Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Hans Marten HazelbagDepartment of Pathology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Laura A SmitDepartment of Pathology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Erienne M V de CubaDepartment of Pathology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marc L OoftDepartment of Pathology, Location Rijnstate Hospital, Pathology-DNA, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Niels J RuppDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Elisabeth M P SteeghsDepartment of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Mischa de RidderDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Remco de BreeDepartment of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marije SlingerlandDepartment of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Vincent T H B M SmitDepartment of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Sylvia L van EgmondDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Danielle CohenDepartment of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Salivary gland tumors are rare and morphologically diverse, posing both diagnostic and scientific challenges. This study presents the first phase of the SALV-Dataset Registry; a nationwide, expertly curated, and fully digitized clinicopathological resource, designed to support research and develop artificial intelligence (AI) tools assisting in salivary gland tumor pathology diagnostics.

methodsSalivary gland tumor resections diagnosed at the Leiden University Medical Center (1999-2024) were collected through the Dutch national network and registry for histo- and cytopathology (PALGA). In total, 685 cases were included. Hematoxylin- and eosin-stained slides were digitized and independently reviewed by three teams of head and neck pathologists, in line with the 2023 WHO Classification of Head and Neck Tumours. Discordant and ambiguous cases were resolved in consensus meetings, with access to immunohistochemistry, molecular analysis, and clinical data. Interobserver agreement among the three teams was quantified (Fleiss' kappa), and agreement between the original and consensus diagnosis was determined (Cohen's kappa).

resultsOf the 685 tumors, 75% were benign, 24% malignant, and 1% of uncertain malignant potential. The parotid gland was most frequently involved (86%), and the highest rate of malignancy was observed in the sublingual gland (100%). Rare entities were represented, although numbers remained limited. Interobserver agreement was substantial (κ of 0.64; 95% 0.60-0.67). Agreement between the original and consensus diagnosis was excellent (Cohen's κ of 0.89; 95% CI 0.86-0.92). Forty-three cases (6%) were reclassified following revision, with a change in diagnostic category in 11 cases (2%).

conclusionThis study demonstrates the feasibility of large-scale, expert digital revision of salivary gland tumors, and establishes a robust foundation for future clinicopathological and AI-based research. With national expansion ongoing, the SALV-Dataset Registry will provide a comprehensive resource for AI training, validation, and clinically oriented modeling in salivary gland tumor diagnostics.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedRegistriesSalivary Gland NeoplasmsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsYoung AdultArtificial intelligenceDiagnostic revisionInterobserver agreementSalivary gland tumors

Identifiers

PMID42249224
PMCPMC13241568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.