ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2026
Artificial intelligence system for anatomical landmark detection in rectovaginal fistula repair surgery: technical development and educational evaluation.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeRectovaginal fistula from perineal body injury during delivery is rare, with limited case volumes preventing standardized protocols. We developed an AI system for anatomical landmark detection and evaluated its educational potential during surgery.
methodsThis pilot feasibility study developed an AI system using HyperSeg semantic segmentation to detect anatomical landmarks (perineal body, vaginal wall, rectum) during rectovaginal fistula repair. Training data comprised 2000 annotated images from 10 cases; 100 images from 5 independent cases served as the test dataset. Dense sampling, reverse-chronological annotation, and multi-structure detection were employed to maximize performance with limited data. Surgical outcomes and intraoperative communication were compared between a pre-AI period and an AI evaluation period (5 cases each; 25 consecutive cases total). The trainee assistant-with no prior experience in this procedure-referenced the AI display while the supervisor guided without viewing it.
resultsThe AI model achieved Dice coefficients of 0.655 ± 0.185 (perineal body), 0.672 ± 0.167 (vaginal wall), and 0.705 ± 0.144 (rectum). The rectum met the predefined threshold of 0.7; the vaginal wall and perineal body approached but did not reach this threshold, reflecting the inherently ambiguous boundaries of these thin membranous structures. Temporal comparison between periods showed: 221% difference in dissection time efficiency (p = 0.008), 73% reduction in blood loss (p = 0.056), and 185% difference in repair time efficiency (p = 0.056). Despite shorter operative times, intraoperative communication increased substantially: Supervisor instructions increased 71% (dissection phase, p = 0.008) and 68% (repair phase, p = 0.012); assistant questions increased 67% and 100%, respectively (all p ≤ 0.012, Cliff's δ = 1.000).
conclusionThis pilot feasibility study demonstrated technical feasibility of AI landmark detection in rectovaginal fistula repair using only 10 training cases, with the rectum achieving the predefined Dice threshold. A temporal increase in intraoperative communication was observed following AI introduction, suggesting potential facilitation of supervisor-trainee interactions. Future controlled studies are required to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42249221What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.