ArticleClinical oral investigations2026
Dietary patterns characterized by high fiber intake in vegan and omnivorous individuals are associated with distinct salivary proteomic signatures linked to oral homeostasis.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesWe compared the salivary proteome and metaproteome of individuals with real-world dietary patterns differing in fiber intake (i.e., high- versus low-fiber intake) to examine whether their diet was associated with distinct molecular signatures in saliva. MATERIALS AND
methodsSixteen participants from a cross-sectional study were classified into high-fiber (n = 8) and low-fiber (n = 8) intake groups based on dietary assessment. Although these groups corresponded to vegan and omnivorous patterns, respectively, classification was based on fiber intake. Groups were matched for age, sex, socioeconomic status, while major dietary differences inherent to vegan and omnivorous patterns were explicitly considered in the interpretation. Stimulated whole saliva was collected under standardized fasting conditions. Human proteomic and microbial metaproteomic analyses were performed using bottom-up DIA-PASEF. Differentially abundant proteins, enriched pathways, and metaproteomic profiles were identified using bioinformatic analyses.
resultsFrom 3,332 identified proteins, 1,566 were quantifiable, and 66 were differentially abundant between groups (FDR [False Discovery Rate] < 0.05). Multivariate analyses revealed separation according to dietary patterns differing in fiber intake: high-fiber exhibited enrichment of homeostasis, lipid metabolism, and cytoprotective pathways, with increased abundance of PRP-1/2, CA6, APOA1, and HYOU1. Low-fiber showed enrichment of immune and oxidative stress pathways, with higher SOD1, GPX1, ANXA2, ANXA8, and S100A8. Metaproteomics analysis revealed no major taxonomic differences but greater interindividual variability in the low-fiber intake group.
conclusionDietary patterns characterized by different dietary fiber intake appear associated with distinct salivary proteomic signatures. Although the contribution of other co-occurring dietary factors cannot be excluded, these findings, based on a small, highly selected cohort, suggest that fiber-rich dietary patterns may support oral homeostasis through host-driven molecular pathways rather than major shifts in microbial composition. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our findings strengthen the rationale for considering dietary patterns with high-fiber intake not only as a systemic health determinant but also as a modulator of salivary molecular functions relevant to oral disease prevention and personalized care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42249210What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.