ArticleInternational journal of hematology2026
Influence of time, temperature, and mechanical agitation on whole-blood and plasma sample stability in coagulation tests.
Article in International journal of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Preanalytical variables strongly influence coagulation test results; however, their combined effects remain insufficiently evaluated. This study examined whole-blood and plasma stability under conditions mimicking current sample storage and transport practices, focusing on three variables: time, temperature, and mechanical agitation. Coagulation tests were performed using four manufacturers' systems, and sample stability was assessed using percentage changes with a 10% criterion and statistical analysis. Among all conditions tested, frozen plasma was consistently the most stable across assays. Whole blood stored at room temperature showed relatively smaller changes, whereas refrigerated whole blood exhibited the largest variation, with factor VIII activity and von Willebrand factor antigen levels decreasing to ≤ 30% even in samples obtained from healthy participants. In some refrigerated samples, clotting times shortened, leading to false-negative lupus anticoagulant results. Mechanical agitation had only marginal effects compared with time and temperature. Sample stability differed substantially between whole blood and plasma and across test types, and the alteration of sample quality accelerated depending on time and temperature conditions, leading to variable testing results. This study underscores the importance of immediate frozen plasma preparation after blood collection to prevent misinterpretation in clinical practice, particularly when prolonged storage is unavoidable, as in outsourced testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42249206What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.