ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2026
Socioeconomic status and outcomes following spine stereotactic body radiation therapy.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe Area Deprivation Index (ADI) ranks neighborhoods by adverse social exposome, considering factors related to income, education, employment, and housing quality. This study evaluates the association between socioeconomic status and outcomes following spine stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).
methodsA prospectively maintained database of consecutive patients treated with spine SBRT at a quaternary referral center from 2001 to 2024 was analyzed. Patient addresses were matched to the 2020 ADI to define most advantaged (ADI ≤ 50, 140 patients, 227 metastases) and least advantaged (ADI > 50, 357 patients, 553 metastases) cohorts.
resultsThe distribution of race and ethnicity differed between cohorts, with a greater proportion of Black or African American patients in the least advantaged cohort (2% vs. 6%, P = 0.008). Public insurance coverage was more common in the least advantaged cohort (42% vs. 54%, P = 0.020). There were no differences with respect to age (P = 0.904), sex (P = 0.495), Karnofsky Performance Status (P = 0.930), radioresistant histologies (P = 0.626), systemic disease burden (P = 0.127), prior or adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.146) or immunotherapy (P = 0.537), prior open surgical resection (P = 0.196) or conventional external beam radiation therapy (P = 0.268), Bilsky grade (P = 0.191), Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (P = 0.076), gross tumor volume (P = 0.731), fractionation regimen (P = 0.437), or biologically effective dose (P = 0.499). There was no difference in 6-month, 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year local control (96%, 88%, 85%, and 79% vs. 91%, 83%, 76%, and 73%; P = 0.062) or overall survival (72%, 56%, 37%, and 28% vs. 70%, 55%, 36%, and 28%; P = 0.890). There was no difference in complete or partial pain response (44% vs. 41%, P = 0.196), radiation toxicity (12% vs. 12%, P = 0.876), or vertebral compression fractures (11% vs. 10%, P = 0.637) following treatment. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses did not identify race or ethnicity, insurance coverage, or the ADI as predictors of local control or overall survival.
conclusionRace or ethnicity, insurance coverage, and neighborhood deprivation were not associated with any measured outcomes following spine SBRT. These findings suggest equitable SBRT delivery once patients access care at an academic referral center and reinforce the need to improve referral pathways and insurance authorization for socioeconomically disadvantaged patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42249171What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.