ArticlePsychopharmacology2026
Reinforcement sensitivity phenotype modulates the impact of chronic stress on hedonic capacity in rats, but not the response to fluoxetine.
Article in Psychopharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionDepression is a heterogeneous psychiatric disorder shaped by the interaction between environmental stress and individual traits, such as reinforcement sensitivity. These traits influence how individuals process rewarding and aversive outcomes, and affect both vulnerability to depression, and treatment response. Here, we investigated whether reinforcement sensitivity-based phenotypes modulate behavioral outcomes of chronic stress and fluoxetine treatment in rats.
methodsUsing the probabilistic reversal learning task, 160 rats were classified into four phenotypes: dysthymic, irritable, pro-depressive, and pro-manic. Animals were then exposed to chronic restraint stress and treated with fluoxetine (10 mg/kg, i.p.) or vehicle, followed by behavioral screening in sucrose preference, progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement, and light-dark box tests. Computational reinforcement learning models were also fitted to probabilistic reversal learning performance to estimate learning rates and choice strategies.
resultsResults revealed phenotype-dependent effects of stress, with the pro-depressive group showing selective vulnerability to stress-induced anhedonia. Across phenotypes, chronic stress reduced sucrose preference and appetitive motivation, confirming its broad negative impact. Mathematical modeling paralleled these findings: pro-depressive rats had increased learning rates from negative outcomes, and were less likely to select choices with higher perceived value. Fluoxetine did not alleviate deficits; instead, it consistently decreased hedonic status and motivation while increasing anxiety-like behaviors, independent of phenotype or stress exposure. Consistent with this, fluoxetine further lowered learning rates, providing a mechanistic account of its paradoxical effects on reward learning.
conclusionsOur findings underscore the need for trait-informed approaches to antidepressant research and highlight potential adverse effects of fluoxetine on emotional and motivational processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42249157What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.