Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42249157›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2026

Reinforcement sensitivity phenotype modulates the impact of chronic stress on hedonic capacity in rats, but not the response to fluoxetine.

Agata Cieslik-Starkiewicz, Michal Piksa, Karolina Noworyta, Jan Rodriguez Parkitna, Rafal Rygula

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Agata Cieslik-StarkiewiczDepartment of Affective Cognitive Neuroscience, Maj Institute of Pharmacology Polish Academy of Sciences, 12 Smetna Street, 31-343, Krakow, Poland.
Michal PiksaDepartment of Affective Cognitive Neuroscience, Maj Institute of Pharmacology Polish Academy of Sciences, 12 Smetna Street, 31-343, Krakow, Poland.
Karolina NoworytaDepartment of Affective Cognitive Neuroscience, Maj Institute of Pharmacology Polish Academy of Sciences, 12 Smetna Street, 31-343, Krakow, Poland.
Jan Rodriguez ParkitnaDepartment of Molecular Neuropharmacology, Maj Institute of Pharmacology Polish Academy of Sciences, 12 Smetna Street, 31-343, Krakow, Poland.
Rafal RygulaDepartment of Affective Cognitive Neuroscience, Maj Institute of Pharmacology Polish Academy of Sciences, 12 Smetna Street, 31-343, Krakow, Poland. rygula@gmail.com.

Funding

Narodowe Centrum Nauki 2021/43/B/HS6/02007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDepression is a heterogeneous psychiatric disorder shaped by the interaction between environmental stress and individual traits, such as reinforcement sensitivity. These traits influence how individuals process rewarding and aversive outcomes, and affect both vulnerability to depression, and treatment response. Here, we investigated whether reinforcement sensitivity-based phenotypes modulate behavioral outcomes of chronic stress and fluoxetine treatment in rats.

methodsUsing the probabilistic reversal learning task, 160 rats were classified into four phenotypes: dysthymic, irritable, pro-depressive, and pro-manic. Animals were then exposed to chronic restraint stress and treated with fluoxetine (10 mg/kg, i.p.) or vehicle, followed by behavioral screening in sucrose preference, progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement, and light-dark box tests. Computational reinforcement learning models were also fitted to probabilistic reversal learning performance to estimate learning rates and choice strategies.

resultsResults revealed phenotype-dependent effects of stress, with the pro-depressive group showing selective vulnerability to stress-induced anhedonia. Across phenotypes, chronic stress reduced sucrose preference and appetitive motivation, confirming its broad negative impact. Mathematical modeling paralleled these findings: pro-depressive rats had increased learning rates from negative outcomes, and were less likely to select choices with higher perceived value. Fluoxetine did not alleviate deficits; instead, it consistently decreased hedonic status and motivation while increasing anxiety-like behaviors, independent of phenotype or stress exposure. Consistent with this, fluoxetine further lowered learning rates, providing a mechanistic account of its paradoxical effects on reward learning.

conclusionsOur findings underscore the need for trait-informed approaches to antidepressant research and highlight potential adverse effects of fluoxetine on emotional and motivational processing.

Indexed as

AnhedoniaAnimal modelFluoxetineSSRIStress

Identifiers

PMID42249157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.