ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
Robotic vs open Puestow procedure for chronic pancreatitis: an updated 15-year experience.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPain from chronic pancreatitis (CP) impairs quality of life and demands continuous treatment, whether pharmacological, endoscopic or surgical. Surgical treatment for CP can include solely decompression, resection, or a combination of both. The modified Puestow [1] procedure is an established indication for patients with a dilated pancreatic duct and without the need for parenchyma resection.
methodsWe report a series of 48 patients who have undergone a Puestow procedure from January 2009 to July 2025 (28 open and 21 robotic).
resultsThis is a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database. Comparison between groups reveals a shorter overall hospital length of stay and zero readmissions among the robotic group (respectively p = 0.036 and 0.029), as well as no difference in morbidity or operative time when compared to open cases.
conclusionAt our high-volume HPB center, robotic Puestow procedures are safe and feasible, with similar complication rates and earlier discharge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.