ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
Learning like a radiologist: a medical vision-language model for radiological image analysis via curriculum learning.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Medical vision-language models (MVLMs) offer promise in clinical practice but face limitations in generalizability, data quality, and clinically meaningful evaluation. We propose RadiSim-CL, an MVLM trained via curriculum learning by simulating the three-phase pathway of a radiologist: foundational knowledge understanding, anatomical knowledge, and advanced diagnostic reasoning. To support this, we curate RadiSim, a 12-million image-text pair dataset aligned to these phases. We evaluate the model using a five-stage coarse-to-fine validation framework: (1) modality recognition, (2) anatomical recognition, (3) anatomical localization, (4) abnormality and disease diagnosis, and (5) disease differentiation and grading. This framework spans 24 zero-shot subtasks across MR, CT, and DR imaging. RadiSim-CL achieves comparable performance to state-of-the-art baselines in both foundational and anatomical tasks, and demonstrates superior capabilities in complex reasoning (e.g., an AUC of 0.953 for brain tumor diagnosis and an accuracy of 0.764 for meningioma grading). Ablation studies further confirm the curriculum's effectiveness. RadiSim-CL thus offers a scalable, clinically aligned solution to enhance diagnostic precision.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.