Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42249120›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2026

A prospective randomized comparative trial of da Vinci SP versus da Vinci Xi in colon and rectosigmoid cancer surgery: a single-center, open-label study protocol.

Yasuhiro Ishiyama, Yasumitsu Hirano, Sohei Akuta, Yume Minagawa, Akihito Nakanishi, Yusuke Nishi, Hisashi Hayashi, Takatsugu Fujii, Hirofumi Sugita, Chikashi Hiranuma

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yasuhiro IshiyamaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Saitama Prefecture, Hidaka, Japan. yishiyama1215@saitama-med.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7754-7926
Yasumitsu HiranoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Saitama Prefecture, Hidaka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9087-2715
Sohei AkutaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Saitama Prefecture, Hidaka, Japan.
Yume MinagawaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Saitama Prefecture, Hidaka, Japan.
Akihito NakanishiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Saitama Prefecture, Hidaka, Japan.
Yusuke NishiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Saitama Prefecture, Hidaka, Japan.
Hisashi HayashiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Saitama Prefecture, Hidaka, Japan.
Takatsugu FujiiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Saitama Prefecture, Hidaka, Japan.
Hirofumi SugitaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Saitama Prefecture, Hidaka, Japan.
Chikashi HiranumaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Saitama Prefecture, Hidaka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal cancer surgery increasingly emphasizes not only oncological outcomes but also postoperative recovery and patient-centered outcomes. Robotic-assisted surgery has gained widespread acceptance, and the da Vinci Single-Port (SP) system has emerged as a novel platform that may further reduce surgical invasiveness compared with the conventional multi-port da Vinci Xi system. However, current evidence comparing these platforms in colon cancer surgery remains limited to retrospective studies.

methodsThis study is a single-center, open-label, prospective randomized controlled trial designed to compare the da Vinci SP and Xi systems inpatients undergoing curative robot-assisted surgery for clinical stage 0-III colon or rectosigmoid adenocarcinoma. A total of 200 patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the SP or Xi group. The primary endpoint is postoperative pain assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale on postoperative days 1 and 3. Secondary endpoints include operative variables, postoperative complications, inflammatory markers, pathological outcomes, and patient satisfaction.

conclusionsThis trial is expected to provide prospective evidence on the clinical value of the SP platform and to support evidence-based decision-making in robotic colon cancer surgery. The trial has been registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR: R000065814).

trial registrationUMIN-CTR R000065814 (2025/4/13) Saitama Medical University International Medical Center.

Indexed as

Colonic NeoplasmsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRectal NeoplasmsRobotic Surgical ProceduresSigmoid NeoplasmsHumansPostoperative PainProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeColon cancerDa Vinci SPDa Vinci XiRandomized clinical trials

Identifiers

PMID42249120
PMCPMC13457322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.