Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42249114›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026

EyeRAG: graph retrieval-augmented generation for safe and accurate clinical dialogue in ophthalmology.

Kaikai Zhao, Daohuan Kang, Tao Yu, Rui Yao, Wenzheng Han, Ke Liang, Rupesh Agrawal, Andrzej Grzybowski, Kai Jin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kaikai Zhao *Eye Center of Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Daohuan Kang *Department of Ophthalmology, Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Hangzhou, China.
Tao YuEye Center of Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Rui YaoSchool of Computer Science and Technology, School of Artificial Intelligence, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China.
Wenzheng HanThe First Affiliated Hospital, Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, Anhui, China.
Ke LiangCollege of Computer Science and Technology, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, China.
Rupesh AgrawalNational Healthcare Group Eye Institute, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Tan Tock Seng, Singapore, Singapore.
Andrzej GrzybowskiInstitute for Research in Ophthalmology, Foundation for Ophthalmology Development, Poznan, Poland.
Kai JinEye Center of Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China. jinkai@zju.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 62172417National Natural Science Foundation of China 82201195
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large language models promise to transform ophthalmic clinical communication but face challenges from factual inaccuracies (hallucinations) and limited domain knowledge. This study introduces EyeRAG, a guideline-grounded GraphRAG system for ophthalmic dialogue that integrates OphthaKG, a domain-specific knowledge graph, constructed exclusively from clinical guidelines. We evaluated EyeRAG across 120 clinical scenarios (40 each for glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, and cataract), six LLMs (GPT-4o, Gemini 2.5 Flash, Grok 4, Llama 3.3 70B, Claude Sonnet 4, DeepSeek-V2.5), and four RAG configurations, assessing clinical accuracy and patient-centered relevance. Validated by LLM-as-a-judge and board-certified ophthalmologists on internal/external datasets, EyeRAG outperformed Vanilla LLMs and standard RAG. LLM evaluations ranked EyeRAG highest (mean 1.61 ± 1.04 internal/1.72 ± 1.18 external). Experts assigned a mean rank of 1.0, with hallucinations falling to 3.3% (vs. 30% baseline). EyeRAG demonstrates the potential for safe, explainable, and clinically grounded language models to be developed as clinician-supervised aids designed specifically to bridge the communication gap between clinicians and patients. It serves as a tool for patient interpretation rather than clinical decision-making, assisting in patient counselling and tele-ophthalmology by translating complex findings into accessible dialog under professional oversight.

Identifiers

PMID42249114
PMCPMC13562699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.