Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42249097›Full record

ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026

Drug supply shortages and their consequences for the medical profession: a survey in Germany and Austria.

Julia Maria Rotter, Roland Seifert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Julia Maria RotterInstitute of Pharmacology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Roland SeifertInstitute of Pharmacology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany. seifert.roland@mh-hannover.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug supply shortages are increasingly becoming a critical topic in the treatment of patients. Not only the reasons for the supply shortages are important but also their consequences for the medical profession. Firstly, this paper identifies which drug shortages have particularly affected medical doctors. Secondly, the additional time required for medical doctors due to supply shortages is analysed. A survey was conducted with 895 physicians from Germany and Austria using a purposive sampling method. The survey targets the supply shortages and its consequences for the medical profession of 20 commonly used drugs. All survey questions referred to the time span from November 2022 to January 2024. Penicillin V and amoxicillin emerged as the drugs most seriously affected by drug supply shortage although the severity to which physicians were affected by the individual 20 drug shortages varied regionally (Germany/Austria), depending on the place of work (practice/clinic) and the physicians' specialty. Drug shortages reported by survey participants did not necessarily match official reporting of drug shortage. There was also a substantial increase in time required for medical doctors handling drug shortages. The most additional time burden per affected drug was recognised in haematology/oncology with 46 min, followed by psychiatry (37 min), nephrology (37 min), and general medicine (28 min). The identification of specific critical drugs, specific disciplines, and defined time-consuming factors offer starting points for improvements. Moreover, exact reporting of drug shortages by official authorities is important. Encouraging more judicious prescribing practices may help reduce perceived shortages.

Indexed as

PhysiciansAustriaGermanyHumansPharmaceutical PreparationsSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsPharmaceutical PreparationsAustriaDrug supply shortageGermanyPenicillinsPrescription behaviourSurveyTime expenditure

Identifiers

PMID42249097
PMCPMC13503409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.