ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
Enhancing foundation model transfer for prostate cancer detection with patch-level contrastive learning.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate localization of prostate cancer on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains challenging due to the subtle appearance of cancer, resulting in missed clinically significant cancers, large inter-reader variability and large numbers of confounders that require biopsy confirmation. Vision foundation models have shown promise, but direct transfer to prostate MRI is challenging due to the substantial domain gap between natural images and prostate MRI and the subtle appearance of prostate cancer. We therefore developed prostate vision contrastive networks (ProViCNet), a weakly supervised model utilizing patch-level contrastive learning on MRI to support MRI-based screening, biopsy targeting and focal treatment planning. ProViCNet was trained and validated (using 4401 patients across six cohorts) as a prostate cancer detection model on MRI. Training labels were biopsy-confirmed radiologist annotations, while the evaluation labels included both biopsy and surgery-confirmed lesions. ProViCNet demonstrated consistent detection and segmentation performance across multiple internal and external validation cohorts, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) values ranging from 0.875 to 0.966, and outperforming radiologists in the MRI expert reader study (0.907 versus 0.805, p < 0.01). We also integrated ProViCNet with serum PSA to develop a virtual screening test, which preserved high sensitivity for detecting clinically significant cancers while more than doubling specificity from 15% to 38% (p < 0.001) among men with PSA ≥ 4 ng/mL, thereby potentially reducing unnecessary biopsies. These findings highlight ProViCNet's potential for enhancing the accuracy of prostate cancer diagnosis and reducing unnecessary biopsies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.