ArticleMolecular psychiatry2026
Hierarchical neural variability reveals adaptive and maladaptive mechanisms of non-suicidal self-injury.
Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is a prevalent and clinically urgent condition in adolescence, marked by impairments in cognitive flexibility-a capacity thought to be supported by neural variability. However, most research to date has focused on static brain features, leaving the role of variability largely unexplored. Importantly, variability-based metrics have been emerging as promising biomarkers in psychiatry, offering superior test-retest and intersession reliability compared with traditional static metrics. Leveraging resting-state fMRI data from 160 psychiatric patients with NSSI, primarily diagnosed with major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, or borderline personality disorder, and 50 psychiatric controls without a history of NSSI, primarily diagnosed with major depressive disorder or bipolar disorder, we examined neural variability at two hierarchical levels-connectivity and network topology-and evaluated their clinical relevance using cross-sectional and longitudinal data. Patients with NSSI consistently exhibited heightened variability at both the connectivity and topology levels, and these measures demonstrated moderate discriminative value in classifying NSSI from psychiatric controls. The functional implications, however, diverged between two levels. Greater connectivity-level variability was associated with better emotional and attentional functioning at baseline, and larger reductions in NSSI behaviors over three months. In contrast, greater topology-level variability was linked to higher impulsivity, and poorer behavioral improvement. These findings reveal that elevated neural variability in NSSI encompass both adaptive and dysregulated dynamics: increases in connectivity variability may promote flexible adaptation, serving as compensatory functions, whereas excessive large-scale reconfiguration in topology may indicate loss of global control, reflecting maladaptive mechanisms. Parallel analyses on conventional static brain features confirmed the complementary role of neural variability. Together, our findings indicate that disruptions in variability across two hierarchies may constitute a neural mechanism underlying NSSI and highlight neural variability as a potential prognostic marker.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.