ArticleScientific reports2026
Preserved and non-preserved social attentional processes in Autism and developmental language disorder at early ages.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Differentiating between Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) in early childhood, when language and behavioral repertoires are not yet fully developed, remains a major challenge in clinical practice. This study aimed to examine which aspects of social attention are preserved or altered in each condition, using eye-tracking. We analyzed how children explored faces and objects in three groups: children with ASD, children with DLD, and non-clinical children. A paired-preference task was used in which children viewed images with one face and one object. Variables included stimulus type (face vs. object), object interest (related vs. unrelated to autistic circumscribed interests), and facial emotional expression (neutral, happy, angry). The sample included 69 children aged 32 to 74 months (23 per group). Eye-tracking measures captured how quickly children oriented to each stimulus (time to first fixation; prioritization index), how long they looked at it (total fixation duration; preference index), and how sustained their visual engagement was (visit duration; duration index). The ASD group showed preserved orientation toward social stimuli, with no differences relative to the non-clinical group. The ASD and DLD groups differed in the duration index, indicating stronger visual engagement with objects in the ASD group. Both prioritization and preference indices differentiated between clinical and non-clinical groups. These findings characterize how children in each group attend to social and non-social information, highlighting distinct patterns that may inform early differential diagnosis and clinical assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.