ArticleScientific reports2026
High-fidelity CNN-based surrogate modeling for wildfire spread forecasting.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rising frequency of large-scale, destructive wildfires has significantly affected not only natural ecosystems but also critical infrastructure, human lives, and properties. Given the devastating and often irreversible environmental and financial consequences, researchers from diverse fields are actively seeking solutions to improve resilience against wildfires. Fire suppression, one of the most effective strategies to mitigate wildfire damage, relies heavily on rapid and high-fidelity forecasting of fire spread. These predictions are essential for planning evacuations by state or local emergency management agencies, implementing preemptive de-energization strategies for electric utilities, and coordinating fire containment efforts by firefighting teams. However, a significant bottleneck across all these planning processes is the significant computational burden imposed by high-resolution wildfire modeling, the demand for improved predictive accuracy, and the need to integrate diverse and large-scale datasets. Since response time is crucial for wildfire risk management, this paper proposes a deep learning-based surrogate model to predict fire spread in just a fraction of a second. We developed and trained a convolutional neural network (CNN) model that efficiently predicts wildfire propagation. The proposed model demonstrates high efficiency, achieving an F1 score of 0.92. The contributions of this paper are twofold: (1) a fast, high-resolution CNN model that can support wildfire-related public safety power shutoff (PSPS) planning for electric utilities, and (2) a practical tool for firefighting and evacuation teams to support rapid and data-informed risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.