ArticleScientific reports2026
Compressive strength prediction of coconut fiber reinforced concrete using PSO optimized explainable machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of natural fibers in concrete is a sustainable strategy to improve ductility and crack resistance; however, coconut fiber can introduce nonlinear interactions among mix constituents that complicate compressive strength prediction. This study proposes an optimized and explainable machine learning framework for compressive strength prediction of coconut fiber reinforced concrete (CFRC). Six regression algorithms, support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), random forest (RF), light gradient boosting (LGB), extreme gradient boosting (XGB), and artificial neural network (ANN) were optimized using particle swarm optimization (PSO) on 586 experimental samples with eight inputs: cement, fine aggregate (FA), natural coarse aggregate (NCA), recycled coarse aggregate (RCA), water, fiber content, fiber length, and age. A nested grouped cross-validation scheme (outer 5-fold, inner 3-fold) was adopted for robust model selection, followed by evaluation on a locked 30% test set. The best model, XGB-PSO, achieved mean cross-validation performance of R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.