ArticleScientific reports2026
A longitudinal evaluation of a four-level practical engineering education framework based on OBE-CDIO principles.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reforming pedagogy in biotechnology pharmaceutics education: a narrative review of emerging teaching strategies.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The transition of engineering education toward competency-oriented training is critical for modern intelligent manufacturing, yet empirical models for resource-constrained local universities remain underexplored. Using a national-level automotive engineering experimental teaching demonstration center in China as a case, this study designed and evaluated a progressive four-level practical teaching system. The system integrates Outcome-Based Education (OBE) and the Conceive-Design-Implement-Operate (CDIO) approach and is supported by a Teaching-Learning-Competition-Innovation (TLCI) linkage mechanism. To evaluate its operation, this study conducted a design-based longitudinal investigation using graduate administrative tracking, competency self-assessment, and employer feedback. Multi-source descriptive evidence showed that, during implementation, the graduate employment rate remained around 95% for four consecutive years, and job-major alignment was approximately 80.0%. In addition, the average starting salary of the 2023 cohort increased by 42% compared with the 2020 cohort, students reported relatively high perceived engineering problem-solving ability, and national competition performance also showed positive trends. These findings suggest that combining industry practice with a competition-driven closed-loop mechanism may provide practical reference for improving the quality of engineering talent cultivation and offer an implementable pathway for educational reform in resource-constrained universities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.