ArticleScientific reports2026
Exploratory eye movement characteristics to aid screening of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: A cross-sectional outpatient study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current psychiatric diagnoses lack objective criteria, and this study aims to evaluate EEM as a potential tool for improving diagnostic objectivity across psychiatric disorders. The Exploratory Eye Movement (EEM) paradigm was used to analyze eye-movement data from patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder and healthy controls. Key metrics included Number of Eye Fixations (NEF), Total Eye Scanning Length (TESL), Mean Eye Scanning Length (MESL), Cognitive Search Score (CSS), and Responsive Search Score (RSS). Group differences were examined with ANOVA and effect sizes, and diagnostic performance was assessed using ROC curves. Feature importance and classification were evaluated with machine learning models using 10-fold cross-validation. Significant age differences were noted between groups, potentially influencing feature selection. NEF and RSS were identified as the most discriminative features, particularly in schizophrenia vs. healthy controls (Cohen's d = -0.79 and -1.12). ROC analysis showed RSS (AUC = 0.84) and NEF (AUC = 0.78) as the top indicators. The SVC model, incorporating demographic features and the top two MI-selected eye movement features (NEF, RSS), achieved an AUC of 0.80 and an F1 score of 0.60, outperforming other models. EEM-based indicators such as RSS, NEF can serve as an adjunctive screening tool to help diagnose but not a stand-alone diagnostic method. Implementing standardized EEM examination procedures in clinical practice is potentially valuable for the early screening of these conditions. Future research could explore integrating EEM with other diagnostic methods to construct an intelligent and comprehensive assessment system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.