ArticleScientific reports2026
Machine learning-based prediction of global solid waste generation and composition.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid growth of municipal solid waste (MSW) driven by urbanization, population expansion, and economic development has emerged as a critical global environmental challenge, thereby requiring effective planning and resource management. However, accurate prediction of MSW generation and composition-which is essential for effective governance-remains hindered by inconsistent and highly heterogeneous global data. To address this gap, this study proposes a data-driven framework using multi-linear regression (MLR) and artificial neural networks (ANN) to forecast MSW across 217 countries. These models incorporate socioeconomic and demographic parameters, including GDP, population, literacy rate, urbanization, and household size. The results indicated that ANN outperformed MLR in terms of predictive accuracy, achieving R² of 0.94 for total MSW generation, compared to ~ 0.57 for MLR and ~ 0.68 reported in the existing global model. While prediction of waste generation exhibited strong accuracy, composition prediction remained challenging (R² up to 0.15), indicating the influence of unaccounted behavioral and regional factors. Despite limitations in accuracy due to data heterogeneity and compositional complexity, the findings of this study can support policymakers and planners in enhancing waste management strategies, optimizing resource recovery, and enabling data-driven decision-making toward sustainable and circular waste management systems aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.