ArticleScientific reports2026
Weber's Law in walking: sensory scaling is observed in multi-sensory, dynamic tasks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Behavioral flexibility requires adequate sensitivity to external stimuli to maintain optimal motor performance under evolving task demands. Empirical evidence shows sensitivity scaling follows Weber's Law, which states that sensory stimulus perception is scaled by background sensory context magnitude. However, Weber's Law has been assessed only in uni-sensory static tasks, and whether this principle extends to multi-sensory, dynamic motor tasks remains an open question. We assessed somatosensory perception of relative leg motion (i.e., speed differences between legs) in healthy young adults, hypothesizing that sensitivity to leg speed differences would follow Weber's Law. We estimated participants' sensitivity to speed differences (sensory stimuli) using two-alternative forced choice (2AFC) tasks. Participants walked at speeds representing distinct sensory contexts: slow (low-intensity), comfortable (medium-intensity), and fast (high-intensity). All groups compared their assigned testing speed against a common reference speed. We found that sensitivity to speed differences was consistent with Weber-like scaling at both slow and fast non-habitual walking speeds, but deviated near comfortable speed. Moreover, a drift-diffusion model using only reaction times reproduced the sensitivity scaling with walking speed, indicating that the model's evidence accumulation process can account for speed-dependent changes in perceptual sensitivity in multi-sensory, dynamic motor tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.