ArticleScientific reports2026
In silico screen identifies Pranidipine as a potential inhibitor of the PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Immune checkpoint blockade targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis using monoclonal antibodies has revolutionized cancer therapy by inducing durable antitumor responses across multiple cancer types. However, antibody-based therapeutics suffer from several limitations, including poor tissue permeability, immune-related adverse effects, complex manufacturing processes, and high production costs. These challenges underscore the need for small-molecule inhibitors (SMIs) as alternative therapeutic agents; nevertheless, to date, no FDA-approved small molecule has demonstrated proven in vivo efficacy against the PD-1/PD-L1 axis. Given the prolonged timelines and substantial costs associated with de novo drug discovery, drug repurposing represents an efficient and cost-effective strategy. In this study, we employed an integrated computational approach to identify potential SMIs capable of disrupting the PD-1/PD-L1 interaction. Structure-based virtual screening of 20 dihydropyridine (DHP) calcium channel blockers (CCBs) was performed using AutoDock Vina, along with CA-170 as a reference inhibitor. Several lead compounds were identified and evaluated based on binding affinity, bonding pose, and interaction patterns. Among the screened compounds, Pranidipine, Isradipine, and Efonidipine exhibited the most favorable binding profiles toward PD-1/PD-L1 complex inhibition. Furthermore, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations confirmed the stability of the interactions between these lead compounds and PD-L1, especially Pranidipine, over time. Collectively, our in silico findings suggest that selected DHP-CCBs may represent promising repurposing candidates for targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint. However, further in vitro studies are required to validate their potential biological activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.