Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42248945›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Spontaneous perceptual reversals are accompanied by systematic changes in pupil size but not respiration phase.

Lisa Stetza, Christoph Kayser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lisa StetzaDepartment for Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Biology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany. lisa.stetza@uni-bielefeld.de.
Christoph KayserDepartment for Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Biology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans tend to align their respiration with important events, in line with the notion that respiration serves as a tool to allocate (neuro-)physiological resources. This respiration alignment is consistently reported in laboratory studies relying on sequences of temporally structured, stimulus-driven experimental trials. Whether this alignment also occurs in the absence of external cues - such as during spontaneous changes of perception - remains unknown. Notably, pupil size is known to change around spontaneous changes in perception, and pupil size covaries with respiration phase, suggesting that respiration may also align to spontaneous changes in perception. We here investigate the three-fold relations between respiration, pupil size, and spontaneous perceptual changes in a paradigm where participants (N = 20) reported spontaneous perceptual reversals of an ambiguous Necker cube. We confirmed the biphasic modulation of pupil size around reversals (constriction followed by dilation) and the covariation of pupil size with respiration phase. However, the alignment of respiration phase to perceptual reversals was much weaker than previously reported for stimulus-driven experimental trials. These findings suggest that changes in perception alone, whether exogenously or endogenously driven, might not be the key driving force of respiration alignment, but the temporal predictability of external events likely facilitates this alignment.

Indexed as

PupilRespirationVisual PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationYoung AdultBistable objectPerceptual reversalPupil sizeRespirationRespiration phase alignment

Identifiers

PMID42248945
PMCPMC13241498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.